OK, Now that I’ve started the post with a nice click-bait heading, let’s get down to the business of being wrong.
I did a lot of conference presentations last year, and the great thing about that for me was that I got to meet a lot of new people in the Oracle community in the Developer and DBA space. One of the questions that came up over and over again was about putting one’s knowledge “out there” in the community and how to deal with the repercussions of that. In particular, “What if you publish something that is proven wrong?”
Here’s the thing about being wrong …. there’s two likely outcomes:
- Someone tells you that you are wrong, or
- You never know that you’re wrong and you wallow about in flawed darkness for all eternity.
Which would you prefer ?
This is really all about perception from both the blogger and the reader, and the way they behave.
If you are the reader and you find something that is incorrect, you have choices:
- Absolutely go ballistic on the author via comments, insult their intelligence, tell them how much smarter than them you are, and that they should never have been born, or
- Initiate a reasoned discussion about where the errors might be, how the author may have come to that point, discuss boundary conditions and both leave the discussion more knowledgeable as a result.
Rest assured, if you take the former position, no amount of smarts is going outweigh the public reputation you’ve just acquired as being a schmuck.
And similarly, as an author of content, when someone points out an error you can:
- take it in good faith, and work toward improving your knowledge by investigating further and collaborating with the person who discovered it, or
- just deny it, and lose your mind at them and denigrate them so that you don’t lose your fine public standing.
If you do the latter….guess what you just lost? Yup, your fine public standing.
And here’s the thing. Even if the person pointing out the error is indeed lacking the basic skills of civility, and is demonstrating their “schmucky-ness” all over your blog, just put that aside and focus on improving the content. Other readers will pick up on this, and they’ll value your contribution to the community much more than Joe Schmuck. They’ll be “red flagged” in the minds of the community as “one of those members that just isn’t worth the time of day”.
And if you’re wondering what the motivation for this post is – just this morning on an AskTOM answer, one of the Product Managers inside Oracle reached out to me and said “Hey Connor – I don’t think that answer is completely correct” and gave some me some additional content about the cause, and how to improve the answer. The net result of that:
- I learn some new stuff!
- The community gets better content from AskTOM!
- I make a new contact within the Oracle organization!
So don’t ever let being wrong stop you from contributing to the community. It’s the best way of improving yourself and the community as well.
Well said, Conner!
Keep doing what you’re doing. You are greatly appreciated.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. I bet secretly you’ve started a smear campaign against that PM! 🙂
They’ll never find the body 🙂
Very relateable post – so many people in the industry just seem to be interested in cheap points scoring that they know something better than you. I think everyone is fine with critiscism as long as its contructive – just saying something is wrong or useless doesn’t help anyone and as you say just makes the commenter look like a ‘schmuck’ (though i doubt they realise that).
Construcitve critiscism helps both you and others learn and its exactly the sort of manager you need at work – pity these are so few and far between.
Keep up the great content – learnt a lot from you over they years in your 400 slide presentations 🙂
Thanks for stopping by.
Man you have a very and positive way of looking things. People like you make this planet a nice place to live
Keep preaching and keep teaching . You are good damn good